![]() If I am wrong, it is that there is a difference that I like. I can’t swear to the recording (but I think so), but it is certain for playback. I check all the set-up in detail, to not be exuberant compensation of panning, volume, a plug-in, etc. I wondered if it was the playback only, because it is definitely higher, but I think it is both recording and playback. I thought that Samplitude would win, due to a past experience (the strings seemed more beautiful in Samplitude, I do not know why), but Samplitude was recording and playback such as Pro Tools and Cubase, the three equal… Only Nuendo was different, softer, Silkier, rounder. With SSL Preamp, SSL converter (Alpha Link 24-bit / 96 kHz), all in ADAT in a RME DSP 9632. Same set-up for the piano, same set up for voice, etc. But I have tests for recording for several hours. This question comes up frequently, I know. Audio difference between Cubase (and Samplitude and Pro Tools) and Nuendo
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |